World Bank Cancels Flagship Report After Investigation

World Bank Cancels Flagship Report After Investigation

. The World Bank has canceled a report assessing the global business climate. Staff were forced to change data that affected the rankings of China and other countries.

This episode was a bad publicity hit for Ms. Georgieva who did not agree with the findings of investigators. She is responsible in part for managing the political pressure of nations to further their interests as the leader of IMF, which is the lender of last recourse to countries struggling around the globe. This was the latest instance of China’s government looking for ways to improve its international standing.

An external investigation was conducted to verify the data integrity in the Doing Business report HTML1. On Thursday, the bank released the results of that investigation, which concluded that senior bank leaders including Ms. Georgieva were involved in pressuring economists to improve China’s 2018 ranking. She and other bank officials were trying to convince China to fund a boost to the bank’s funding .

*. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to our request for comment. An email asking for comment was not answered by Mr. Kim.

Ms. Georgieva said: “I disagree fundamentally with the findings and interpretations of the Investigation of Data Irregularities as it relates to my role in the World Bank’s Doing Business report of 2018.”

The Doing Business report has been a flagship publication for the World Bank, which conducts economic research alongside its primary work of providing financing in poor countries. Media coverage of the annual report was extensive. Countries jockeyed for position by changing their policies.

*For many years the report has been hailed as a success. It motivated governments to make it easier for businesses to get licenses and connect to electricity, which are all factors that were considered when ranking countries.

Chinese officials in 2017 and 2018 were eager to see their ranking improve, and so Mr. Kim and Ms. Georgieva and their staff held a series of meetings to discuss ways that the report’s methodology could be altered to improve China’s rankings, according to the investigative report by the law firm WilmerHale.

The World Bank was in the middle of difficult international negotiations to receive a $13 billion capital increase. China, despite being the second-largest economy in the world is still the largest. China is the third largest shareholder of the World Bank. This follows the U.S., Japan and India. Beijing wanted to see how its power was in a deal for additional funding.

In October 2017, Ms. Georgieva convened a meeting of the World Bank’s country director for China, as well as the staff economists that compile Doing Business. According to an investigative report, she criticised “mismanaging China’s relations with the Bank and failing to recognize the importance of Doing Business to the country.”

*An unidentified staffer who was working on Doing Business said they could improve China’s rankings by dropping data from Shanghai or Beijing, as China’s ranking combines data from both of these cities. The investigative report stated that Ms. Georgieva requested a simulation.

. Investigators later stated that the staff concluded the proposed change would not have the intended effect. The rating of other countries would also be affected, which could reduce the improvements in China’s score.

*The investigative report stated that the team had identified three data points which could be changed to improve China’s rating. China passed legislation regarding secured transactions. This refers to when someone borrows money with collateral. According to the World Bank staff, it would give China an improvement in its legal rights score.

The investigative report stated that although the World Bank staff knew the changes weren’t appropriate, “a majority” of Doing Business employees expressed fear of reprisal.

Although the data-gathering process for the 2018 report was finished, the World Bank’s economists reopened the data tables and altered China’s data, the investigative report said. Instead of ranking 85th among the world’s countries, China climbed to 78th due to the alterations. A number of minor changes, as detailed in the investigation report, also affected rankings for Azerbaijan and the United Arab Emirates.

When Ms. Georgieva was informed of the changes, investigators said, she thanked one of the senior Doing Business leaders for doing his “bit for multilateralism.”

In April of 2018, the U.S., China and other member countries finalized the deal to boost the World Bank’s funding. China is not yet aware of the impact that China’s ranking improvements had on China’s support. China had been supporting the World Bank’s capital rise for a long time.

*The Treasury Department overseeing U.S. participation at the IMF/World Bank expressed concern about the findings of the investigation. Both the IMF and the World Bank are jointly owned by the member countries. The largest stake in both institutions is held by the U.S. Treasury.

These are important findings, and Treasury is analysing the report,” stated Alexandra LaManna, a Treasury spokesperson. “Our primary responsibility is to uphold the integrity of international financial institutions.”

Justin Sandefur, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development think tank who has long criticized the Doing Business report, said: “You had enormous discretion by World Bank staff combined with super high stakes for World Bank client countries getting named and shamed in the media, and it was just a recipe for political interference.”

Concerns about Doing Business first became public in 2018 when the World Bank’s chief economist, Paul Romer, said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal that he was concerned the report was susceptible to campaigns to alter its data for political purposes. According to Mr. Romer, he was unsure about a number of changes made to the report that had improved Chile’s ranking with conservative governments but decreased its rank under socialist governments.

The World Bank refuted the claim that the report was manipulated and Mr. Romer resigned soon .. At the time, he stated that the World Bank’s function as an honest broker for economic reports like Doing Business was fundamentally in conflict with its diplomatic mission.

Following the discovery of the additional data irregularities in 2020, the bank halted publication of the report–initially just temporarily–and commissioned the external investigation.

Write to Josh Zumbrun at

Copyright (c)2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.